deltatrials
Completed OBSERVATIONAL NCT00124488

Comparison of Tomotherapy Versus Intensity-modulated Step-and-shoot and Conventional Radiation Treatment Plans for Patients With Locally-advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix

Sponsor: Alberta Health services

Updated 7 times since 2017 Last updated: Dec 8, 2011 Started: Jun 30, 2005 Completion: Nov 30, 2005
This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

This observational or N/A phase trial investigates Cervix Neoplasm and is currently completed. Alberta Health services leads this study, which shows 7 recorded versions since 2005 — indicating limited longitudinal coverage. As an oncology study, it adds to the longitudinal record of treatment development for this indication.

Study Description(click to expand)

Background Information: The addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) for locally-advanced cervix cancer has improved patient outcomes, but treatments are associated with significant rates of radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicities. Plus, the disease-free and overall survival benefits conferred by concurrent chemotherapy appear to be most prominent in patients with earlier stage disease. Limits to RT for cervix cancer which can impact patient outcomes are overall treatment time and RT dose. Attempts to overcome these limits have been made in trials using altered RT fractionation schemes. Promising rates of local control reported in these trials are offset by excessive rates of acute and late RT-related toxicities. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is innovative RT planning and delivery technology with the ability to vary the intensity of radiation across a beam, allowing for increased conformity of RT dose around target volumes along with decreased dose delivered to normal structures. Tomotherapy uses an intensity-modulated beam which rotates around the patient as the patient is being translated longitudinally through the gantry and features the ability to acquire megavoltage CT (MVCT) images of target structures at each treatment. It is thought that Tomotherapy can plan and deliver more conformal RT with the added advantage of daily assessment of...

Background Information:

The addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) for locally-advanced cervix cancer has improved patient outcomes, but treatments are associated with significant rates of radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicities. Plus, the disease-free and overall survival benefits conferred by concurrent chemotherapy appear to be most prominent in patients with earlier stage disease. Limits to RT for cervix cancer which can impact patient outcomes are overall treatment time and RT dose. Attempts to overcome these limits have been made in trials using altered RT fractionation schemes. Promising rates of local control reported in these trials are offset by excessive rates of acute and late RT-related toxicities.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is innovative RT planning and delivery technology with the ability to vary the intensity of radiation across a beam, allowing for increased conformity of RT dose around target volumes along with decreased dose delivered to normal structures. Tomotherapy uses an intensity-modulated beam which rotates around the patient as the patient is being translated longitudinally through the gantry and features the ability to acquire megavoltage CT (MVCT) images of target structures at each treatment. It is thought that Tomotherapy can plan and deliver more conformal RT with the added advantage of daily assessment of target and critical structure position via MVCT imaging.

Experience with using IMRT for cervix cancer is sparse. Reports of treating pelvic nodal targets in small numbers of selected cervix cancer patients with IMRT suggests that the treatments are tolerable and associated with decreased incidences of acute and late RT-related toxicities compared with a similar patient cohort treated with conventional RT technologies. Currently, there is no published report of using Tomotherapy to plan or deliver RT using conventional or altered fractionation for cervix cancer patients.

The limitations of overall treatment time and the maximal dose of RT that can be safely delivered to the pelvis targets make cervical carcinoma a tumor in which Tomotherapy can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio. Tomotherapy's ability to deliver more conformal RT to target structures and minimize dose to normal structures may allow for delivery of altered fractionation radiation plans for cervix cancer with acceptable rates of RT-related toxicities. Tomotherapy allows for delivery of differential daily doses of RT to target volumes that lie within larger target volumes which in effect delivers a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to areas of gross disease which lie within a larger volume at risk for harbouring micrometastases. Delivery of the boost dose of radiation in a simultaneous as opposed to sequential fashion decreases the overall RT treatment time which theoretically reduces the effects of accelerated tumor cell repopulation. Delivering higher doses per fraction to areas of gross disease would theoretically increase the radiobiologic enhancement effects of concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy.

Tomotherapy represents a key advance in radiotherapy planning and delivery technology. Its potential dosimetric and radiobiologic advantages over standard radiotherapy technologies need evaluation in properly-conducted clinical trials. Prior to the initiation of such trials, it must be shown that Tomotherapy plans at least have dosimetric advantages over conventional plans.

Objective:

To compare radiotherapy (RT) plans created for locally-advanced cervix cancer cases using Tomotherapy, conventional computed tomography-based methods and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated methods.

Study Design:

Pre-treatment planning computed tomography scans of ten previously-treated cervix cancer patients will be used. All identifying patient data on these CT image sets will be completely removed. Three RT plans will be created for case: Tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT, and conventional. The University Medical Centre in Utrecht, The Netherlands has implemented IMRT into clinical management of cervical cancer and the Gynecologic Oncology group there has graciously agreed to collaborate on this project by creating optimized step-and-shoot IMRT plans on our ten test cases. The anonymous CT image sets will be stored on data discs which will be sent via bonded courier to the University Medical Centre in Utrecht, The Netherlands for generation of step and shoot IMRT plans. Data to be calculated and collected from all plans include: dose-volume histograms (DVH's) for all target volumes and critical structures. Tumor Control Probability for targets and Normal Tissue Complication Probability for critical structures will be calculated. RT plans created on this protocol will only be used for dose and biophysical model calculation comparisons; no plan will be used to deliver actual radiation treatments to any patient. There will be absolutely no patient contact or interaction on this protocol.

Future Directions:

The investigators anticipate that results from this study will confirm the hypothesis that Tomotherapy plans incorporating a simultaneous integrated boost for cervix cancer will provide superior target volume coverage and normal critical structure avoidance when compared with step-and-shoot IMRT and conventional plans. Such confirmation will provide the basis to proceed with efforts to improve target and normal structure delineation for Tomotherapy treatment planning of cervix cancer using MRI-based planning. Ultimately, we plan to initiate phase I/II trials using MRI-based Tomotherapy planning and delivery techniques for cervix cancer patients. Incorporation of RT dose escalation and monitoring of treatment response with biologic imaging techniques for cervix cancer patients treated with Tomotherapy are other future potential areas of investigation.

Status Flow

~Jan 2017 – ~Apr 2018 · 15 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Apr 2018 – ~Jun 2018 · 2 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jun 2018 – ~Jan 2021 · 31 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jan 2021 – ~Oct 2022 · 21 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Oct 2022 – ~Jul 2024 · 21 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jul 2024 – ~Sep 2024 · 2 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Sep 2024 – present · 19 months · monthly snapshotCompleted

Change History

7 versions recorded
  1. Sep 2024 — Present [monthly]

    Completed

  2. Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

    Completed

  3. Oct 2022 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

    Completed

  4. Jan 2021 — Oct 2022 [monthly]

    Completed

  5. Jun 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

    Completed

Show 2 earlier versions
  1. Apr 2018 — Jun 2018 [monthly]

    Completed

    Phase: NANone

  2. Jan 2017 — Apr 2018 [monthly]

    Completed NA

    First recorded

Jun 2005

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:
  • Alberta Health services
Data source: AHS Cancer Control Alberta

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Study Locations