deltatrials
Completed PHASE3 INTERVENTIONAL NCT00211289

Trial of Education and Compliance in Heart Dysfunction (TEACH)

Trial of Education and Compliance in Heart Dysfunction. A Study Measuring the Impact of Multi-disciplinary Education as an Intervention to Increase Patient Concordance and the Cost Effectiveness of Treatment in Patients With Heart Dysfunction

Sponsor: London Health Sciences Centre

Conditions Heart Failure
Updated 7 times since 2017 Last updated: Mar 20, 2025 Started: Jul 31, 2002 Primary completion: Sep 30, 2008
This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

Listed as NCT00211289, this PHASE3 trial focuses on Heart Failure and remains completed. Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre, it has been updated 7 times since 2002, reflecting limited change activity. This study contributes longitudinal data to the cardiovascular research landscape.

Study Description(click to expand)

INTRODUCTION: Heart Failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalization in Canada. While great advances have been made in the treatment of this disease, factors limiting the effectiveness of treatment include: poor compliance to dietary guidelines and medications, patients' lack of understanding about the impact of their disease, a lack of understanding of the impact of their lifestyle habits on their disease and the lack of systematic monitoring of patients following hospitalization. The objective of this trial of education and compliance in heart failure patients (TEACH) is to measure in patients with heart failure who are hospitalized and then discharged into the community, the impact of a comprehensive outpatient educational intervention on: 1. a composite endpoint of mortality, readmissions and visits to the emergency room for all causes, 2. the impact of the intervention on health-related quality of life, 3. the impact of the intervention on compliance to medication and 4. the economic impact of providing such an intervention to patients. A unique component of this study is the participation of community pharmacists as part of a seamless care model and the economic and qualitative evaluation of the educational interventions. RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized controlled...

INTRODUCTION: Heart Failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalization in Canada. While great advances have been made in the treatment of this disease, factors limiting the effectiveness of treatment include: poor compliance to dietary guidelines and medications, patients' lack of understanding about the impact of their disease, a lack of understanding of the impact of their lifestyle habits on their disease and the lack of systematic monitoring of patients following hospitalization. The objective of this trial of education and compliance in heart failure patients (TEACH) is to measure in patients with heart failure who are hospitalized and then discharged into the community, the impact of a comprehensive outpatient educational intervention on:

1. a composite endpoint of mortality, readmissions and visits to the emergency room for all causes, 2. the impact of the intervention on health-related quality of life, 3. the impact of the intervention on compliance to medication and 4. the economic impact of providing such an intervention to patients. A unique component of this study is the participation of community pharmacists as part of a seamless care model and the economic and qualitative evaluation of the educational interventions.

RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial in patients who are admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of heart failure. Patients are stratified by reason for admission to the hospital. Stratum 1 includes patients whose primary reason for admission is HF and stratum 2 includes patients whose primary reason for hospital admission is not HF. The randomization will follow a cluster randomization design such that the community pharmacies will be randomized to deliver either an intervention (INTERVENTION) or usual care (CONTROL). Patients will be assigned to one of the two arms contingent upon which pharmacy they obtain most of their medications from. All patients receive standardized in-hospital education that has been previously validated (Eur J of HF, in press 2003). This education consists of educational booklets and videos on HF, health promotion and dietary information as well as relevant intervention from their community pharmacist that is aimed at helping the patients become more compliant with their medication and provide a framework of understanding that helps persistence.

HYPOTHESIS: HF patients who receive an enhanced educational intervention from their community pharmacist will:

1. have an absolute risk reduction in the number of events of 20%, 2. be more compliant, 3. demonstrate less health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impairment as measured by disease-specific and generic HRQoL instruments and 4. lower costs/quality adjusted life years (QALY) due to fewer total events per patient.

OUTCOMES: Outcomes are collected every 3 months from baseline to end of one year. Events are tracked using a comprehensive database that we have developed and validated. Further utilization data will be provided by ICES data linkage facilities and patient interviews at the time of outcome assessment. In order to measure compliance we will continue to use electronic measures known as Track Caps (MEMS). The other indirect measure is pharmacy refill data that is provided to us from all community pharmacies the patient uses. This data will be interpreted using a validated formula developed by Steiner et al. (1996). Resource use and clinical outcomes are also collected.

IMPORTANCE: Medication used to treat HF and other chronic diseases can only work, if used. We are providing a validated education intervention to patients through an existing community infrastructure with an aim to reduce morbidity and mortality and have a positive impact on HRQoL within a cost-effective framework.

Status Flow

~Jan 2017 – ~Jun 2018 · 17 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jun 2018 – ~Jan 2021 · 31 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jan 2021 – ~Jul 2024 · 42 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jul 2024 – ~Sep 2024 · 2 months · monthly snapshotUnknown~Sep 2024 – ~Apr 2025 · 7 months · monthly snapshotUnknown~Apr 2025 – present · 12 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jan 2026 – present · 3 months · monthly snapshotCompleted

Change History

7 versions recorded
  1. Jan 2026 — Present [monthly]

    Completed PHASE3

  2. Apr 2025 — Present [monthly]

    Completed PHASE3

    Status: UnknownCompleted

  3. Sep 2024 — Apr 2025 [monthly]

    Unknown PHASE3

  4. Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

    Unknown PHASE3

    Status: Unknown StatusUnknown

  5. Jan 2021 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

    Unknown Status PHASE3

Show 2 earlier versions
  1. Jun 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

    Unknown Status PHASE3

  2. Jan 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]

    Unknown Status PHASE3

    First recorded

Jul 2002

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:
  • London Health Sciences Centre
Data source: London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Study Locations