deltatrials
Completed PHASE2 INTERVENTIONAL 3-arm NCT00299975

A Dose Determination Study of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Functional Constipation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Three-dose Regimen for the Treatment of Functional Constipation

Sponsor: Hong Kong Baptist University

Conditions Constipation
Updated 5 times since 2017 Last updated: Apr 8, 2015 Started: Oct 31, 2006 Primary completion: Aug 31, 2007 Completion: Oct 31, 2007
This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

Listed as NCT00299975, this PHASE2 trial focuses on Constipation and remains completed. Sponsored by Hong Kong Baptist University, it has been updated 5 times since 2006, reflecting limited change activity. This study adds to the evidence base for this therapeutic area through structured, versioned documentation.

Study Description(click to expand)

Functional constipation (FC) is a common complaint in clinical practice, with the estimated prevalence 14.3% in Hong Kong, as nearly affecting 1 million Hong Kong People in different extent. It is comparable with western population, which is 15% in North America. By the definition of Rome II criteria, FC comprises a group of functional disorders, which presents as persistent difficult, infrequent or seemingly incomplete defecation. Constipation is often perceived to be benign, easily treated condition with short-term treatment being relatively straightforward. However, the fact is the management of FC is perplexed as some subjects complain of constipation more than decade. Moreover, chronic constipation can develop into more serious bowel complaints, such as faecal impaction, incontinence and bowel perforations. There is also accumulating evidence shown that constipated subjects have significantly higher anxiety and depression scores and lower quality of life. Therefore, the demand of effective agents to normalize bowel function is extremely large. Conventional treatment for constipation mainly relies on dietary fibre and laxatives. Although there is no credible evidence that any serious problem is associated with their prolonged use, the treatment of it has been suboptimal. First, a recent systematic review pointed out that there were paucity of trials for...

Functional constipation (FC) is a common complaint in clinical practice, with the estimated prevalence 14.3% in Hong Kong, as nearly affecting 1 million Hong Kong People in different extent. It is comparable with western population, which is 15% in North America. By the definition of Rome II criteria, FC comprises a group of functional disorders, which presents as persistent difficult, infrequent or seemingly incomplete defecation.

Constipation is often perceived to be benign, easily treated condition with short-term treatment being relatively straightforward. However, the fact is the management of FC is perplexed as some subjects complain of constipation more than decade. Moreover, chronic constipation can develop into more serious bowel complaints, such as faecal impaction, incontinence and bowel perforations. There is also accumulating evidence shown that constipated subjects have significantly higher anxiety and depression scores and lower quality of life. Therefore, the demand of effective agents to normalize bowel function is extremely large.

Conventional treatment for constipation mainly relies on dietary fibre and laxatives. Although there is no credible evidence that any serious problem is associated with their prolonged use, the treatment of it has been suboptimal. First, a recent systematic review pointed out that there were paucity of trials for many commonly used agents, therefore, their use might not be well validated. Second, many patients with severe constipation do not respond adequately or lose of effectiveness after a short period of time. Third, many patients who intake dietary fibre complain of flatulence, distension, bloating and poor taste. As a result, the compliance is low as about 50%. Fourth, the use of osmotic laxatives, such as polyethylene glycol, become increasingly popular due to fewer side effects and better taste, however, the prices are much more expensive than other medications. Many constipation sufferers seek help from alternative medicine, especially from Chinese herbal medicine. For example, according to a telephone survey in Hong Kong, more than 85% of constipated subjects seek for coping strategies, such as asking for medical consultations, taking prescribed medicine and seeking for alternative therapy, involving Chinese medicine.

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is particularly attractive as their effectiveness in treating functional disorders and retaining balance of body functions. The CHM used in study is derived from classic text of Chinese medicine (Shang Han Lun, Discussion of Cold-induced Disorders), which can "moisten the intestines, drain heat, promote the movement of qi and unblock the bowel".

It is well known that randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard to test the efficacy of intervention, thus in this project, we attempt to follow the basic requirements of RCT to testify the efficacy and safety of CHM on FC, as well as to determine the optimal dosage. We believe such study will benefit the advancement of CHM, or even as the foundation of research study in future.

Status Flow

~Jan 2017 – ~Jun 2018 · 17 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jun 2018 – ~Jan 2021 · 31 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jan 2021 – ~Jul 2024 · 42 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jul 2024 – ~Sep 2024 · 2 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Sep 2024 – present · 19 months · monthly snapshotCompleted

Change History

5 versions recorded
  1. Sep 2024 — Present [monthly]

    Completed PHASE2

  2. Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE2

  3. Jan 2021 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE2

  4. Jun 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE2

  5. Jan 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE2

    First recorded

Oct 2006

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:
  • Hong Kong Baptist University
Data source: Hong Kong Baptist University

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Study Locations