deltatrials
Unknown NA INTERVENTIONAL NCT00322426

Sensory Cues for Freezing in Parkinson's Disease

Effect of Randomized Patient-Triggered Sensory Cues for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

Sponsor: Austin Health

Updated 6 times since 2017 Last updated: Jun 22, 2006 Started: Jul 31, 2006 Completion: Jan 31, 2007
This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

A NA clinical study on Parkinson's Disease, this trial is ongoing. The trial is conducted by Austin Health and has accumulated 6 data snapshots since 2006. Longitudinal tracking of this trial contributes to a broader understanding of treatment development timelines.

Study Description(click to expand)

Freezing of gait (FOG) is defined as a transient halt in motor activity, wherein the patient appears "as if nailed to the floor." It is a common phenomenon in Parkinson's disease (PD), both when medications are at their peak ("on state") and at their lowest effectiveness ("off state"). While "off" FOG often responds to dopaminergic medications, "on" FOG is a difficult to treat, causing significant distress for the patient, and elevating risk of falls and morbidity. A few small studies have suggested that auditory and visual sensory cues, in the form of continuous stimuli such as a clicking metronome, music, or horizontal lines drawn the floor, may help patients with gait freezing. In this study, we aim to: (1) evaluate if stimuli (including visual, auditory as well as tactile cues) which are present only on patient triggering are effective for FOG in PD; (2) investigate if presentation of unexpected cues, in the form of randomized sensory stimuli, are more effective that anticipated cues. Participants will include patients diagnosed with PD, stabilized on drug therapy, with adequate vision, hearing, and mentation to respond to cuing, and experiencing "on" FOG. Patients will be evaluated during a single session. A small device which...

Freezing of gait (FOG) is defined as a transient halt in motor activity, wherein the patient appears "as if nailed to the floor." It is a common phenomenon in Parkinson's disease (PD), both when medications are at their peak ("on state") and at their lowest effectiveness ("off state"). While "off" FOG often responds to dopaminergic medications, "on" FOG is a difficult to treat, causing significant distress for the patient, and elevating risk of falls and morbidity.

A few small studies have suggested that auditory and visual sensory cues, in the form of continuous stimuli such as a clicking metronome, music, or horizontal lines drawn the floor, may help patients with gait freezing. In this study, we aim to: (1) evaluate if stimuli (including visual, auditory as well as tactile cues) which are present only on patient triggering are effective for FOG in PD; (2) investigate if presentation of unexpected cues, in the form of randomized sensory stimuli, are more effective that anticipated cues.

Participants will include patients diagnosed with PD, stabilized on drug therapy, with adequate vision, hearing, and mentation to respond to cuing, and experiencing "on" FOG. Patients will be evaluated during a single session. A small device which we have developed will be placed around the neck, and emit either repetitive beeping, a flashing line on the floor, or a slight vibration felt over the neck when the patient presses a button on the front panel in response to FOG. Participants will be videotaped walking a 15 m strip with: (1) no cues; (2) auditory cues only; (3) visual cues only; (4) tactile cues only; and (5) randomized cues. The order in which patients receive the cues will be randomized.

A reviewer will watch the videotape with sound off so that they will be blinded to the cues. The Total Time, Freezing Time (duration of walk in which patient experiences freezing, Walking Time (duration of walk during which patient is not experiencing freezing), and Average Duration of Freeze will be recorded for each walk.

Status Flow

~Jan 2017 – ~Jun 2018 · 17 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jun 2018 – ~Jan 2021 · 31 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jan 2021 – ~Jul 2024 · 42 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jul 2024 – ~Sep 2024 · 2 months · monthly snapshotUnknown~Sep 2024 – present · 19 months · monthly snapshotUnknown~Jan 2026 – present · 3 months · monthly snapshotUnknown

Change History

6 versions recorded
  1. Jan 2026 — Present [monthly]

    Unknown NA

  2. Sep 2024 — Present [monthly]

    Unknown NA

  3. Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

    Unknown NA

    Status: Unknown StatusUnknown

  4. Jan 2021 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

    Unknown Status NA

  5. Jun 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

    Unknown Status NA

Show 1 earlier version
  1. Jan 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]

    Unknown Status NA

    First recorded

Jul 2006

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:
  • Austin Health
Data source: Austin Health

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Study Locations