Completed OBSERVATIONAL NCT00962897

Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Femoral Artery Occlusion

A Retrospective Review of Randomized Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Femoral Artery Occlusion With Four Years Followup

Sponsor: Texas Vascular Associates

Conditions Atherosclerosis Claudication Lower Extremity Ischemia Rest Pain

Interventions Femoral-popliteal bypass Stent-graft placement

Updated 5 times since 2017 Last updated: Aug 19, 2009 Started: Sep 30, 2003 Primary completion: May 31, 2007 Completion: Jul 31, 2009

This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

Listed as NCT00962897, this observational or N/A phase trial focuses on Atherosclerosis and Claudication and remains completed. Sponsored by Texas Vascular Associates, it has been updated 5 times since 2003, reflecting limited change activity. This study adds to the evidence base for this therapeutic area through structured, versioned documentation.

Status Flow

Change History

5 versions recorded

Sep 2024 — Present [monthly]

Completed
Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

Completed
Jan 2021 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

Completed
Apr 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

Completed

Phase: NA → None
Jan 2017 — Apr 2018 [monthly]

Completed NA

First recorded

Sep 2003

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:

Texas Vascular Associates
W.L.Gore & Associates

Data source: Texas Vascular Associates

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Study Locations

• Dallas, United States