deltatrials
Completed PHASE4 INTERVENTIONAL 2-arm NCT01381185

REsistance to Aspirin and Clopidogrel in acuTe Myocardial Infarction (REACT-MI)

Phase IV Study of Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy Tailored by Functional Thrombocyte Examination (PFA-100, LTA and VerifyNOW) in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Sponsor: University Hospital Ostrava

Updated 7 times since 2017 Last updated: Oct 26, 2016 Started: May 31, 2011 Primary completion: Jun 30, 2015 Completion: Jul 31, 2015
This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

This PHASE4 trial investigates Acute Myocardial Infarction and is currently completed. University Hospital Ostrava leads this study, which shows 7 recorded versions since 2011 — indicating limited longitudinal coverage. Heart and vascular conditions benefit from the kind of long-term tracking this trial provides.

Study Description(click to expand)

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment of coronary heart disease after coronary stent implantation. The interindividual response to this therapy is not uniform, however. There are subgroups of patients, where no anticipated antiplatelet effect to either aspirin, clopidogrel or both is reached. The term of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance has been introduced few years ago, most recently it was substituted by more suitable term - high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HPR). Although there are many assays to monitor antiplatelet therapy, uncertainty still remains about the correlation of HPR with ischemic vascular events (in-stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, etc.). Thus platelet aggregation testing is considered to be the most promising method to indicate inappropriate/low response to aspirin/clopidogrel, however the best suited method is not established yet. Up-to date light transmittance aggregometry is widely accepted as golden standard, nonetheless labour intensive and difficult to standardize. On the other hand many point-of-care aggregation testing methods like PFA-100, VerifyNOW, Multiplate etc. have been introduced, their role in clinical practice is uncertain, however. The biggest challenge of today is to determine platelet function assay, which could reliably indicate future ischemic vascular events;moreover it could be potentially used to tailor antiplatelet therapy and precede these events. It...

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment of coronary heart disease after coronary stent implantation. The interindividual response to this therapy is not uniform, however. There are subgroups of patients, where no anticipated antiplatelet effect to either aspirin, clopidogrel or both is reached. The term of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance has been introduced few years ago, most recently it was substituted by more suitable term - high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HPR). Although there are many assays to monitor antiplatelet therapy, uncertainty still remains about the correlation of HPR with ischemic vascular events (in-stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, etc.). Thus platelet aggregation testing is considered to be the most promising method to indicate inappropriate/low response to aspirin/clopidogrel, however the best suited method is not established yet. Up-to date light transmittance aggregometry is widely accepted as golden standard, nonetheless labour intensive and difficult to standardize. On the other hand many point-of-care aggregation testing methods like PFA-100, VerifyNOW, Multiplate etc. have been introduced, their role in clinical practice is uncertain, however. The biggest challenge of today is to determine platelet function assay, which could reliably indicate future ischemic vascular events;moreover it could be potentially used to tailor antiplatelet therapy and precede these events. It was demonstrated, that gene polymorphism - CYP2C19\*2 and CYP2C9\*3 loss of function is conjugated with an increased occurrence of stent thrombosis. Within the project we also plan to examine 4 alleles which have not been examined in detail before.

Status Flow

~Jan 2017 – ~Jun 2018 · 17 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jun 2018 – ~Jan 2021 · 31 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jan 2021 – ~Jul 2024 · 42 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jul 2024 – ~Sep 2024 · 2 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Sep 2024 – ~Sep 2025 · 12 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Sep 2025 – present · 7 months · monthly snapshotCompleted~Jan 2026 – present · 3 months · monthly snapshotCompleted

Change History

7 versions recorded
  1. Jan 2026 — Present [monthly]

    Completed PHASE4

  2. Sep 2025 — Present [monthly]

    Completed PHASE4

  3. Sep 2024 — Sep 2025 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE4

  4. Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE4

  5. Jan 2021 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE4

Show 2 earlier versions
  1. Jun 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE4

  2. Jan 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE4

    First recorded

May 2011

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:
  • University Hospital Ostrava
Data source: University Hospital Ostrava

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .