deltatrials
Unknown PHASE4 INTERVENTIONAL 2-arm NCT01531829

Low Dose Rt-PA for Acute Normotensive Pulmonary Embolism With RVD

Low Dose Rt-PA Plus LMWH Compared With LMWH Alone for the Treatment of Normotensive Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Acute RV Dysfunction: A Randomized,Multi-Center,Controlled Trial

Sponsor: Beijing Chao Yang Hospital

Updated 6 times since 2017 Last updated: Feb 11, 2012 Started: Jul 31, 2009 Primary completion: Jul 31, 2012 Completion: Dec 31, 2012
This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

Listed as NCT01531829, this PHASE4 trial focuses on Pulmonary Embolism and Pulmonary Thromboembolisms and remains ongoing. Sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, it has been updated 6 times since 2009, reflecting limited change activity. This study adds to the evidence base for this therapeutic area through structured, versioned documentation.

Study Description(click to expand)

In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), normotensive patients with acute RV dysfunction on echocardiography or computed tomography and with myocardial troponin elevation may have an adverse outcome. Thrombolysis rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but it increases the possibility of bleeding and it remains unclear whether it may improve the early or long-term clinical outcome of these selected normotensive patients. In our previous study, we found that low dose (50mg/2h) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) regimen had less bleeding tendency than the 100mg/2h regimen (3% vs.10%), it is worthwhile to reveal whether low dose rt-PA plus Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) can rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but not increase bleeding and other adverse events. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, control study, we compare low dose rt-PA plus LMWH vs. LMWH alone in acute normotensive pulmonary embolism patients with RV dysfunction. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of death from any cause or treatment failure, improvements of right ventricular functions on echocardiogram and pulmonary artery obstruction on CT angiographs within 7 days of randomization. Second efficacy outcome is the recurrence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Safety outcomes include serious life threatening bleeding such as cerebral...

In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), normotensive patients with acute RV dysfunction on echocardiography or computed tomography and with myocardial troponin elevation may have an adverse outcome. Thrombolysis rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but it increases the possibility of bleeding and it remains unclear whether it may improve the early or long-term clinical outcome of these selected normotensive patients.

In our previous study, we found that low dose (50mg/2h) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) regimen had less bleeding tendency than the 100mg/2h regimen (3% vs.10%), it is worthwhile to reveal whether low dose rt-PA plus Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) can rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but not increase bleeding and other adverse events.

In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, control study, we compare low dose rt-PA plus LMWH vs. LMWH alone in acute normotensive pulmonary embolism patients with RV dysfunction. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of death from any cause or treatment failure, improvements of right ventricular functions on echocardiogram and pulmonary artery obstruction on CT angiographs within 7 days of randomization. Second efficacy outcome is the recurrence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Safety outcomes include serious life threatening bleeding such as cerebral hemorrhage and other major bleeding episodes, also include mild bleeding. In addition, 90-day clinical and echocardiographic follow-up will be performed, the recurrence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis will be recorded. The study is expected to enroll approximately 460 patients.

By determining the benefits vs risks of Low dose rt-PA plus LMWH compared with LMWH alone for the treatment in submassive or intermediate-risk PE, this trial is expected to reveal the worth of Low dose rt-PA plus LMWH treatment and what kind of PE patients are suitable for thrombolysis.

Status Flow

~Jan 2017 – ~Jun 2018 · 17 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jun 2018 – ~Jan 2021 · 31 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jan 2021 – ~Jul 2024 · 42 months · monthly snapshotUnknown Status~Jul 2024 – ~Sep 2024 · 2 months · monthly snapshotUnknown~Sep 2024 – ~Sep 2025 · 12 months · monthly snapshotUnknown~Sep 2025 – present · 7 months · monthly snapshotUnknown

Change History

6 versions recorded
  1. Sep 2025 — Present [monthly]

    Unknown PHASE4

  2. Sep 2024 — Sep 2025 [monthly]

    Unknown PHASE4

  3. Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

    Unknown PHASE4

    Status: Unknown StatusUnknown

  4. Jan 2021 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

    Unknown Status PHASE4

  5. Jun 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

    Unknown Status PHASE4

Show 1 earlier version
  1. Jan 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]

    Unknown Status PHASE4

    First recorded

Jul 2009

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:
  • Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of China
Data source: Beijing Chao Yang Hospital

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .