Low Dose Rt-PA for Acute Normotensive Pulmonary Embolism With RVD
Low Dose Rt-PA Plus LMWH Compared With LMWH Alone for the Treatment of Normotensive Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Acute RV Dysfunction: A Randomized,Multi-Center,Controlled Trial
Sponsor: Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Listed as NCT01531829, this PHASE4 trial focuses on Pulmonary Embolism and Pulmonary Thromboembolisms and remains ongoing. Sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, it has been updated 6 times since 2009, reflecting limited change activity. This study adds to the evidence base for this therapeutic area through structured, versioned documentation.
Study Description(click to expand)In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), normotensive patients with acute RV dysfunction on echocardiography or computed tomography and with myocardial troponin elevation may have an adverse outcome. Thrombolysis rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but it increases the possibility of bleeding and it remains unclear whether it may improve the early or long-term clinical outcome of these selected normotensive patients. In our previous study, we found that low dose (50mg/2h) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) regimen had less bleeding tendency than the 100mg/2h regimen (3% vs.10%), it is worthwhile to reveal whether low dose rt-PA plus Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) can rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but not increase bleeding and other adverse events. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, control study, we compare low dose rt-PA plus LMWH vs. LMWH alone in acute normotensive pulmonary embolism patients with RV dysfunction. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of death from any cause or treatment failure, improvements of right ventricular functions on echocardiogram and pulmonary artery obstruction on CT angiographs within 7 days of randomization. Second efficacy outcome is the recurrence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Safety outcomes include serious life threatening bleeding such as cerebral...
In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), normotensive patients with acute RV dysfunction on echocardiography or computed tomography and with myocardial troponin elevation may have an adverse outcome. Thrombolysis rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but it increases the possibility of bleeding and it remains unclear whether it may improve the early or long-term clinical outcome of these selected normotensive patients.
In our previous study, we found that low dose (50mg/2h) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) regimen had less bleeding tendency than the 100mg/2h regimen (3% vs.10%), it is worthwhile to reveal whether low dose rt-PA plus Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) can rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but not increase bleeding and other adverse events.
In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, control study, we compare low dose rt-PA plus LMWH vs. LMWH alone in acute normotensive pulmonary embolism patients with RV dysfunction. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of death from any cause or treatment failure, improvements of right ventricular functions on echocardiogram and pulmonary artery obstruction on CT angiographs within 7 days of randomization. Second efficacy outcome is the recurrence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Safety outcomes include serious life threatening bleeding such as cerebral hemorrhage and other major bleeding episodes, also include mild bleeding. In addition, 90-day clinical and echocardiographic follow-up will be performed, the recurrence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis will be recorded. The study is expected to enroll approximately 460 patients.
By determining the benefits vs risks of Low dose rt-PA plus LMWH compared with LMWH alone for the treatment in submassive or intermediate-risk PE, this trial is expected to reveal the worth of Low dose rt-PA plus LMWH treatment and what kind of PE patients are suitable for thrombolysis.
Status Flow
Change History
6 versions recorded-
Sep 2025 — Present [monthly]
Unknown PHASE4
-
Sep 2024 — Sep 2025 [monthly]
Unknown PHASE4
-
Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]
Unknown PHASE4
Status: Unknown Status → Unknown
-
Jan 2021 — Jul 2024 [monthly]
Unknown Status PHASE4
-
Jun 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]
Unknown Status PHASE4
▶ Show 1 earlier version
-
Jan 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]
Unknown Status PHASE4
First recorded
Jul 2009
Trial started
Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot
Eligibility Summary
No eligibility information available.
Contact Information
- Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of China
For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .
Study Locations
Anshan, China , Baotou, China , Beijing, China , Chengde, China , Chengdu, China , Dalian, China , Guangzhou, China , Handan, China , Hangzhou, China , Harbin, China and 15 more locations