Unknown NA INTERVENTIONAL 2-arm NCT01698190

Comparing the Efficacy of Endoscopic FNA vs FNB in Diagnosing Solid Gastrointestinal Lesions

Comparing the Overall Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Fine Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Lesions: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

Sponsor: Columbia University

Conditions Duodenal Tumor Esophageal Tumor Gastric Tumor Lymphadenopathy Pancreatic Tumor

Interventions Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle tissue acquisition.

Updated 5 times since 2017 Last updated: Nov 18, 2014 Started: Dec 31, 2011 Primary completion: Dec 31, 2014 Completion: Dec 31, 2014

This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

A NA clinical study on Duodenal Tumor and Esophageal Tumor, this trial is ongoing. The trial is conducted by Columbia University and has accumulated 5 data snapshots since 2011. Oncology trials at this stage typically focus on safety, tolerability, and early efficacy signals.

Status Flow

Change History

5 versions recorded

Sep 2024 — Present [monthly]

Unknown NA
Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

Unknown NA

Status: Unknown Status → Unknown
Jan 2021 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

Unknown Status NA
Jun 2018 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

Unknown Status NA
Jan 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]

Unknown Status NA

First recorded

Dec 2011

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:

Columbia University
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York Medical College
Stony Brook University
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Yale University

Data source: Stony Brook University

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Study Locations

• Stony Brook, United States