Ferumoxytol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ferumoxytol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Interpretation of Vascular Defects
Sponsor: Brigham and Women's Hospital
Listed as NCT02954510, this PHASE3 trial focuses on Coronary Artery Disease and remains ongoing. Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital, it has been updated 12 times since 2017, reflecting substantial change activity. This study contributes longitudinal data to the cardiovascular research landscape.
Study Description(click to expand)This is a case control study which will assess the resolution by which the coronary arteries can be visualized using ferumoxytol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance angiography (fcMRA) in patients with prior regional cardiac ischemia localized by stress-induced echocardiography. Resolution will be compared to invasive coronary arteriography completed in all patients that will be analyzed at the end of the study. Masked experts will interpret fcMRA images to determine if coronary stenosis is present or absent. By strict definitions, this is a single-arm study. However comparison will be made between fcMRA and invasive coronary arteriography performed in each patient. With a prevalence of disease of approximately 0.35 in the study population, it is anticipated that both sensitivity and specificity of fcMRA to identify the absence of coronary artery stenosis can be calculated. We anticipate a population size of 70 will be needed to adequately study the primary outcome due to potential confounders, including racial and sex differences which may exist (see below), which are known to exist in a population with significant renal and possible cardiac disease to determine if fcMRA is differs in its ability to exclude greater than or equal to 50 percent stenosis in a single coronary artery compared...
This is a case control study which will assess the resolution by which the coronary arteries can be visualized using ferumoxytol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance angiography (fcMRA) in patients with prior regional cardiac ischemia localized by stress-induced echocardiography. Resolution will be compared to invasive coronary arteriography completed in all patients that will be analyzed at the end of the study.
Masked experts will interpret fcMRA images to determine if coronary stenosis is present or absent. By strict definitions, this is a single-arm study. However comparison will be made between fcMRA and invasive coronary arteriography performed in each patient. With a prevalence of disease of approximately 0.35 in the study population, it is anticipated that both sensitivity and specificity of fcMRA to identify the absence of coronary artery stenosis can be calculated.
We anticipate a population size of 70 will be needed to adequately study the primary outcome due to potential confounders, including racial and sex differences which may exist (see below), which are known to exist in a population with significant renal and possible cardiac disease to determine if fcMRA is differs in its ability to exclude greater than or equal to 50 percent stenosis in a single coronary artery compared to dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). This is based on prevalence of disease of 0.35. Non-invasive cardiac stress testing in those with eGFR \<30ml/min/1.73m2 is estimated to have a sensitivity of 0.81 (CI 0.57-0.94) and specificity of 0.83 (CI 0.62-0.95) to identify coronary epicardial lesion of greater than 70 percent. The sensitivity of non-invasive non-intraluminal testing is anticipated to be 0.60 when patients with myocardial scar are enrolled. We anticipate that 50 percent of patients with a positive DSE will have evidence of myocardial scar. Predicted sensitivity of fcMRA will likely be increased compared to referenced estimates because true positives will be defined by stenosis greater than or equal to 50 percent. Based on a prevalence of 0.35, we anticipate DSE will yield 24 true positives, 25 true negatives, 7 false positives, and 14 false negatives resulting in sensitivity of 0.63 and specificity of 0.78. To achieve study power that will allow for the null hypothesis to be ignored, in as study size of 70, fcMRA must yield at least 28 true positives and 27 true negatives allowing for 5 false positives and 10 false negatives resulting in sensitivity of 0.737 and specificity of 0.843. To account for drop-out and incomplete data collection in 50 percent of patients approached, recruitment of 140 patients will be needed. The drop-out rate from recruitment to enrollment approximates the fcMRA study experience at the Brigham and Women's Hosptial in 2017.
Racial/sex subgroup analysis will involve testing in whites vs. non-whites and males vs. females. Prevalence of 0.35 will again be assumed. Previously, 45 percent of patients enrolled were of non-white racial origin. An additional 85 patients would be necessary to demonstrate a difference between fcMRA and DSE when comparing sensitivity and specificity as above, therefore this will be considered an exploratory analysis.
Using the Partners Healthcare System Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR) all patients in calendar year 2017 were identified with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease stage 4-5D and who underwent a left heart cardiac catheterization at either Brigham and Women's Hospital or Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). "chronic kidney disease stage 4", "chronic kidney disease stage 5", and "left heart catheterization", and "abnormal echocardiogram" were used as mesh terms resulting in 68 patients. 108 patients utilizing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis completed ICA. 35 patients not yet requiring renal replacement therapy completed ICA in the same time period. Separately, clinical practices at the Brigham and Women's Hospital kidney transplant center in calendar year 2017 were reviewed. 207 patients underwent non-invasive cardiac stress testing and 16 patients underwent ICA. All patients that underwent arteriography had prior non--invasive cardiac stress testing. Surveying both the inpatient and outpatient settings a total of 159 patients were identified in the Partners Healthcare System that would have qualified for the proposed study.
Status Flow
Change History
12 versions recorded-
Jan 2026 — Present [monthly]
Unknown PHASE3
-
Jan 2025 — Present [monthly]
Unknown PHASE3
Status: Active Not Recruiting → Unknown
-
Sep 2024 — Jan 2025 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Feb 2023 — Jul 2024 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
Status: Enrolling By Invitation → Active Not Recruiting
▶ Show 7 earlier versions
-
Jul 2022 — Feb 2023 [monthly]
Enrolling By Invitation PHASE3
-
Nov 2021 — Jul 2022 [monthly]
Enrolling By Invitation PHASE3
-
Jan 2021 — Nov 2021 [monthly]
Enrolling By Invitation PHASE3
-
Jul 2020 — Jan 2021 [monthly]
Enrolling By Invitation PHASE3
-
Jun 2018 — Jul 2020 [monthly]
Enrolling By Invitation PHASE3
-
Mar 2018 — Jun 2018 [monthly]
Enrolling By Invitation PHASE3
Status: Recruiting → Enrolling By Invitation
-
Jan 2017 — Mar 2018 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE3
First recorded
Eligibility Summary
No eligibility information available.
Contact Information
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .