Completed NA INTERVENTIONAL 2-arm NCT04194060

ERAS vs Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-RCT (ERASE)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-A Randomized Control Trial

Sponsor: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

Conditions Emergencies Peptic Ulcer Perforation Perforated Bowel Perioperative Complication Post-Op Complication

Interventions Conventional Enhanced Recovery after Surgery group

Updated 7 times since 2020 Last updated: Mar 16, 2022 Started: Jan 20, 2020 Primary completion: May 15, 2021 Completion: Jun 15, 2021

This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

This NA trial investigates Emergencies and Peptic Ulcer Perforation and is currently completed. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar leads this study, which shows 7 recorded versions since 2020 — indicating limited longitudinal coverage. The change history captured here reflects the iterative nature of clinical trial conduct.

Status Flow

Change History

7 versions recorded

Sep 2024 — Present [monthly]

Completed NA
Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

Completed NA
Apr 2022 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

Completed NA

Status: Unknown Status → Completed
Jan 2022 — Apr 2022 [monthly]

Unknown Status NA

Status: Recruiting → Unknown Status
Jan 2021 — Jan 2022 [monthly]

Recruiting NA

▶ Show 2 earlier versions

Feb 2020 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

Recruiting NA

Status: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting
Jan 2020 — Feb 2020 [monthly]

Not Yet Recruiting NA

First recorded

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

Data source: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Study Locations

• Bhubaneswar, India