Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes Trial (RAPCO)
Randomised Trial of Graft Patency and Clinical Outcomes, Comparing Radial Artery With Either the Right Internal Thoracic Artery or Saphenous Vein
Sponsor: Austin Health
This NA trial investigates Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease and is currently ongoing. Austin Health leads this study, which shows 9 recorded versions since 1996 — indicating limited longitudinal coverage. Heart and vascular conditions benefit from the kind of long-term tracking this trial provides.
Study Description(click to expand)The Department of Cardiac Surgery at Austin Health is conducting a prospective randomised trial, stratified into two separate sub-studies. The first compares the radial artery with the right internal thoracic artery(as a free aorto-coronary graft) and the second comparies the radial artery with a saphenous vein graft. Each patient was to be followed for 10 years after their CABG surgery in order to assess both the pattern of graft survival over 10 years and also to record major clinical events. The study was first given approval by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee on August 18th,1995. Enrolment commenced in June 1996. Recruitment ceased in March 2005. Patients were randomly assigned to the control or experimental group, patients in both groups received the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior decending(LAD) and the study graft as the second graft. The gold standard measure for the comparison of conduits is through the use of post-operative angiograms. These angiograms assess how patent (open) the grafts are, and also offer quality assurance of the CABG surgery performed. To spread the graft patency end-points over the 10 years after CABG, patients undergo a second randomisation as to the time at which their graft...
The Department of Cardiac Surgery at Austin Health is conducting a prospective randomised trial, stratified into two separate sub-studies. The first compares the radial artery with the right internal thoracic artery(as a free aorto-coronary graft) and the second comparies the radial artery with a saphenous vein graft. Each patient was to be followed for 10 years after their CABG surgery in order to assess both the pattern of graft survival over 10 years and also to record major clinical events.
The study was first given approval by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee on August 18th,1995. Enrolment commenced in June 1996. Recruitment ceased in March 2005. Patients were randomly assigned to the control or experimental group, patients in both groups received the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior decending(LAD) and the study graft as the second graft.
The gold standard measure for the comparison of conduits is through the use of post-operative angiograms. These angiograms assess how patent (open) the grafts are, and also offer quality assurance of the CABG surgery performed. To spread the graft patency end-points over the 10 years after CABG, patients undergo a second randomisation as to the time at which their graft patency is to be assessed. The timing of the graft study coronary angiogram is weighted towards the end of the 10 year period with the aim of having 10% at 1 year, 20% at 2 years, 20% at 5 years, 30% at 7.5 years and 30% at 10 years after CABG surgery. Clinical data is systematically collected to determine those patients who experience heart attack, repeat surgery, balloon angioplasty or death over subsequent years.
To enrich the number of mid-study graft patency end-points a protocol amendment(July 19th, 2002) was approved allowing patients to be offered a selective coronary angiogram at the 5 year anniversary of their surgery.
A further protocol amendment(November 16th, 2006) allowed coronary and graft CT angiography to be used optionally to replace selective angiography and also to offer all patients imaging at 10 years, in addition to the original pre-specified, randomised time of imaging.
As per the ethics approval and prior protocol amendments, lifelong followup is conducted on patients enrolled in the trial. As such, a RAPCO-Extension trial will be conducted, evaluating clinical outcomes at 15-years follow-up.
Status Flow
Change History
9 versions recorded-
Jan 2026 — Present [monthly]
Unknown NA
-
Sep 2024 — Present [monthly]
Unknown NA
-
Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]
Unknown NA
Status: Unknown Status → Unknown
-
Jun 2024 — Jul 2024 [monthly]
Unknown Status NA
Status: Active Not Recruiting → Unknown Status
-
Jun 2022 — Jun 2024 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting NA
Status: Unknown Status → Active Not Recruiting
▶ Show 4 earlier versions
-
Jan 2021 — Jun 2022 [monthly]
Unknown Status NA
-
Jan 2019 — Jan 2021 [monthly]
Unknown Status NA
Status: Active Not Recruiting → Unknown Status
-
Jun 2018 — Jan 2019 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting NA
-
Jan 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting NA
First recorded
Jun 1996
Trial started
Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot
Eligibility Summary
No eligibility information available.
Contact Information
- Austin Health
For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .