deltatrials
Completed PHASE3 INTERVENTIONAL 2-arm NCT01546987

Hormone Therapy, Radiation Therapy, and Steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700 in Treating Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Phase III Trial of Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With a GNRH Agonist vs. Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Enhanced ADT With a GNRH Agonist and TAK-700 For Men With High Risk Prostate Cancer

Sponsor: NRG Oncology

Updated 15 times since 2017 Last updated: Feb 12, 2026 Started: May 31, 2012 Primary completion: Nov 1, 2021 Completion: Sep 4, 2025
This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

A PHASE3 clinical study on Prostate Cancer, this trial is completed. The trial is conducted by NRG Oncology and has accumulated 15 data snapshots since 2012. Oncology trials at this stage typically focus on safety, tolerability, and early efficacy signals.

Study Description(click to expand)

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To evaluate the difference in overall survival of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with unfavorable prognostic features between a) standard treatment (androgen-deprivation therapy \[ADT\] + radiotherapy) and b) standard treatment with the addition of 24 months of steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700 (TAK-700). Secondary * To characterize differences between the treatment groups with respect to incidence of unexpected grade ≥ 3 adverse events and/or clinically significant decrement in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) among subjects treated with TAK-700. * To compare rates and cumulative incidence of biochemical control (freedom from PSA failure), local/regional progression, and distant metastases. * To compare rate and cumulative incidence of clinical failure, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \> 25 ng/mL, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of ADT. * To compare prostate cancer-specific survival and other-cause mortality. * To compare the change in severity of fatigue as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue short form. * To compare changes in patient-reported QOL as measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). * To assess quality-adjusted survival using the EQ-5D. * To compare nadir and average serum testosterone at 12 and 24 months during treatment. *...

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* To evaluate the difference in overall survival of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with unfavorable prognostic features between a) standard treatment (androgen-deprivation therapy \[ADT\] + radiotherapy) and b) standard treatment with the addition of 24 months of steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700 (TAK-700).

Secondary

* To characterize differences between the treatment groups with respect to incidence of unexpected grade ≥ 3 adverse events and/or clinically significant decrement in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) among subjects treated with TAK-700. * To compare rates and cumulative incidence of biochemical control (freedom from PSA failure), local/regional progression, and distant metastases. * To compare rate and cumulative incidence of clinical failure, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \> 25 ng/mL, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of ADT. * To compare prostate cancer-specific survival and other-cause mortality. * To compare the change in severity of fatigue as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue short form. * To compare changes in patient-reported QOL as measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). * To assess quality-adjusted survival using the EQ-5D. * To compare nadir and average serum testosterone at 12 and 24 months during treatment. * To compare changes in hemoglobin A1C, fasting glucose, and fasting insulin during 24 months of systemic treatment and during the first three years of follow-up. * To compare changes in fasting lipid levels during 24 months of treatment and during the first three years of follow-up. * To compare changes in body mass index (BMI) during 24 months of treatment and during the first three years of follow-up. * To compare the incidence of adverse events ascertained via CTCAE version 4. * To compare the rate of recovery of testosterone to \> 230 ng/dL (accepted threshold for supplementation) after 12 and 24 months of follow-up. * To compare the median time to recovery of testosterone to \> 230 ng/dL during the first five years of follow-up. * To assess cumulative incidence of relevant clinical survivorship endpoints including new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or osteoporotic fracture.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized study. Patients are stratified according to risk group (see Disease Characteristics) and type of radiation therapy (RT) boost (intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) vs brachytherapy). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 1 year, and then annually thereafter.

Status Flow

~Jan 2017 – ~Feb 2017 · 31 days · monthly snapshot~Feb 2017 – ~Jun 2017 · 4 months · monthly snapshot~Jun 2017 – ~Jun 2018 · 12 months · monthly snapshot~Jun 2018 – ~Sep 2018 · 3 months · monthly snapshot~Sep 2018 – ~Apr 2019 · 7 months · monthly snapshot~Apr 2019 – ~Jan 2021 · 21 months · monthly snapshot~Jan 2021 – ~Sep 2022 · 20 months · monthly snapshot~Sep 2022 – ~May 2023 · 8 months · monthly snapshot~May 2023 – ~Jul 2024 · 14 months · monthly snapshot~Jul 2024 – ~Sep 2024 · 2 months · monthly snapshot~Sep 2024 – ~Oct 2024 · 30 days · monthly snapshot~Oct 2024 – ~Sep 2025 · 11 months · monthly snapshot~Sep 2025 – ~Nov 2025 · 2 months · monthly snapshot~Nov 2025 – ~Mar 2026 · 4 months · monthly snapshot~Mar 2026 – present · 24 days · monthly snapshot

Change History

15 versions recorded
  1. Mar 2026 — Present [monthly]

    Completed PHASE3

  2. Nov 2025 — Mar 2026 [monthly]

    Completed PHASE3

    Status: Active Not RecruitingCompleted

  3. Sep 2025 — Nov 2025 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  4. Oct 2024 — Sep 2025 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  5. Sep 2024 — Oct 2024 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

Show 10 earlier versions
  1. Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  2. May 2023 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  3. Sep 2022 — May 2023 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  4. Jan 2021 — Sep 2022 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  5. Apr 2019 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  6. Sep 2018 — Apr 2019 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  7. Jun 2018 — Sep 2018 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  8. Jun 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  9. Feb 2017 — Jun 2017 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

  10. Jan 2017 — Feb 2017 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting PHASE3

    First recorded

May 2012

Trial started

Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot

Eligibility Summary

No eligibility information available.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:
  • NRG Oncology
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Data source: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .