deltatrials
Completed INTERVENTIONAL NCT03716349

Esthetics of Dental Composite and Adhesive System

Esthetic Outcomes of a Newly Developed Dental Composite and Adhesive System: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Sponsor: Erica Teixeira

Updated 16 times since 2018 Last updated: Apr 10, 2026 Started: Jan 1, 2019 Primary completion: Nov 20, 2025 Completion: Nov 20, 2025
This information is for research purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making any medical decision.

This observational or N/A phase trial investigates Cavities of Teeth and is currently completed. Erica Teixeira leads this study, which shows 16 recorded versions since 2019 — indicating substantial longitudinal coverage. The change history captured here reflects the iterative nature of clinical trial conduct.

Study Description(click to expand)

The aim of this (12-month; 36-month; 60-month) randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the esthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction of a simplified newly developed dental composite system (system A)for the esthetic region to a nanohybrid composite system (Filtek Supreme Ultra-system B) placed in class III, IV and V lesions. Even though dental composite systems have been used extensively for the anterior region, clinicians face challenges with shade selection and longevity of the material over the years. This new system has been developed to improve the esthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction by enhancing the blending capability of the material. Dental composite systems have been used for 50 years as state of art materials to restore the anterior region. Significant development has occurred regarding the composition and structure of dental composites, improving the longevity of these restorations; however, clinicians are faced with the challenge of selecting the most adequate shade and restorative technique to reproduce missing tooth structure. Depending on the size of the cavity preparation, a single layer of material or multiple layers might be needed to reproduce dentin and enamel. Different dental composite systems offer multiple body, dentin, and enamel shades. Therefore, clinicians are faced with the...

The aim of this (12-month; 36-month; 60-month) randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the esthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction of a simplified newly developed dental composite system (system A)for the esthetic region to a nanohybrid composite system (Filtek Supreme Ultra-system B) placed in class III, IV and V lesions. Even though dental composite systems have been used extensively for the anterior region, clinicians face challenges with shade selection and longevity of the material over the years. This new system has been developed to improve the esthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction by enhancing the blending capability of the material.

Dental composite systems have been used for 50 years as state of art materials to restore the anterior region. Significant development has occurred regarding the composition and structure of dental composites, improving the longevity of these restorations; however, clinicians are faced with the challenge of selecting the most adequate shade and restorative technique to reproduce missing tooth structure.

Depending on the size of the cavity preparation, a single layer of material or multiple layers might be needed to reproduce dentin and enamel. Different dental composite systems offer multiple body, dentin, and enamel shades. Therefore, clinicians are faced with the challenge of recreating nature using this material. Different devices, such as spectrophotometers have been introduced on the market for shade selection. However, one of the most important aspects when placing anterior composites is the esthetic outcome based on the patient's assessment. Therefore, this study will evaluate the esthetic outcomes of a simplified and a conventional dental composite system based on the provider's and patient's assessment.

Status Flow

~Nov 2018 – ~Feb 2019 · 3 months · monthly snapshot~Feb 2019 – ~Feb 2020 · 12 months · monthly snapshot~Feb 2020 – ~May 2020 · 3 months · monthly snapshot~May 2020 – ~Jan 2021 · 8 months · monthly snapshot~Jan 2021 – ~Sep 2021 · 8 months · monthly snapshot~Sep 2021 – ~Oct 2021 · 30 days · monthly snapshot~Oct 2021 – ~Jan 2022 · 3 months · monthly snapshot~Jan 2022 – ~Sep 2022 · 8 months · monthly snapshot~Sep 2022 – ~Aug 2023 · 11 months · monthly snapshot~Aug 2023 – ~Dec 2023 · 4 months · monthly snapshot~Dec 2023 – ~Jun 2024 · 6 months · monthly snapshot~Jun 2024 – ~Jul 2024 · 30 days · monthly snapshot~Jul 2024 – ~Sep 2024 · 2 months · monthly snapshot~Sep 2024 – ~Jul 2025 · 10 months · monthly snapshot~Jul 2025 – ~May 2026 · 10 months · monthly snapshotMay 4, 2026 – present · 4 months · daily API

Change History

16 versions recorded
  1. May 4, 2026 — Present [daily]

    Completed

    Status: Active Not RecruitingCompleted · Phase: NANone

  2. Jul 2025 — May 2026 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting NA

  3. Sep 2024 — Jul 2025 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting NA

  4. Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting NA

  5. Jun 2024 — Jul 2024 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting NA

    Status: CompletedActive Not Recruiting

Show 11 earlier versions
  1. Dec 2023 — Jun 2024 [monthly]

    Completed NA

    Status: Active Not RecruitingCompleted

  2. Aug 2023 — Dec 2023 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting NA

  3. Sep 2022 — Aug 2023 [monthly]

    Active Not Recruiting NA

    Status: RecruitingActive Not Recruiting

  4. Jan 2022 — Sep 2022 [monthly]

    Recruiting NA

  5. Oct 2021 — Jan 2022 [monthly]

    Recruiting NA

  6. Sep 2021 — Oct 2021 [monthly]

    Recruiting NA

    Status: SuspendedRecruiting

  7. Jan 2021 — Sep 2021 [monthly]

    Suspended NA

  8. May 2020 — Jan 2021 [monthly]

    Suspended NA

    Status: RecruitingSuspended

  9. Feb 2020 — May 2020 [monthly]

    Recruiting NA

  10. Feb 2019 — Feb 2020 [monthly]

    Recruiting NA

    Status: Not Yet RecruitingRecruiting

  11. Nov 2018 — Feb 2019 [monthly]

    Not Yet Recruiting NA

    First recorded

Eligibility Summary

To compare a newly developed filling composite to a current filling composite system. Two restorations will be placed in each subject, one using system A and one using system B. The first system listed in the randomization pair will be placed on first tooth (#4-#13), and the second system on 2nd tooth (#4-#13). The same three researchers will be responsible for placement of all the restorations.

Contact Information

Sponsor contact:
  • Erica Teixeira
  • Tokuyama Dental Corporation
Data source: ClinicalTrials.gov

For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Study Locations