Rituximab in Treating Patients With Low Tumor Burden Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Two Different Rituximab Dosing Regimens For Patients With Low Tumor Burden Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Sponsor: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
A PHASE3 clinical study on Lymphoma, this trial is completed. The trial is conducted by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and has accumulated 14 data snapshots since 2004. Oncology trials at this stage typically focus on safety, tolerability, and early efficacy signals.
Study Description(click to expand)OBJECTIVES: Primary * To compare time to rituximab failure between the rituximab scheduled and rituximab retreatment arms. Secondary * To compare the time to first cytotoxic therapy between the rituximab scheduled and rituximab retreatment arms. * To document the rationale for beginning cytotoxic therapy; defined as chemotherapy, radiation therapy or radioimmunotherapy. * To compare the toxicities associated with rituximab therapy between the two randomized treatment arms. * Quality of Life Objectives: 1. To compare health-related quality of life, distress, psychological functioning, physical well-being and functional well-being of patients receiving rituximab scheduled to those receiving rituximab retreatment. 2. To examine the impact of differential treatment response (delayed time to rituximab failure and/or time to first cytotoxic therapy), if observed, on quality of life, distress, and psychological functioning on patients receiving rituximab scheduled to those receiving rituximab retreatment. 3. To obtain prospective data on physical and functional well-being during treatment with rituximab. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to histologic subtype (follicular vs other), age (under 60 vs 60 and over), and the time from diagnosis (less than 1 year vs at least 1 year). * Induction rituximab: Patients receive rituximab Intravenous (IV) once a week for...
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
* To compare time to rituximab failure between the rituximab scheduled and rituximab retreatment arms.
Secondary
* To compare the time to first cytotoxic therapy between the rituximab scheduled and rituximab retreatment arms. * To document the rationale for beginning cytotoxic therapy; defined as chemotherapy, radiation therapy or radioimmunotherapy. * To compare the toxicities associated with rituximab therapy between the two randomized treatment arms. * Quality of Life Objectives:
1. To compare health-related quality of life, distress, psychological functioning, physical well-being and functional well-being of patients receiving rituximab scheduled to those receiving rituximab retreatment. 2. To examine the impact of differential treatment response (delayed time to rituximab failure and/or time to first cytotoxic therapy), if observed, on quality of life, distress, and psychological functioning on patients receiving rituximab scheduled to those receiving rituximab retreatment. 3. To obtain prospective data on physical and functional well-being during treatment with rituximab.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to histologic subtype (follicular vs other), age (under 60 vs 60 and over), and the time from diagnosis (less than 1 year vs at least 1 year).
* Induction rituximab: Patients receive rituximab Intravenous (IV) once a week for 4 weeks.
Patients are re-evaluated 9 weeks after the completion of induction rituximab. Patients with a partial or complete response to induction rituximab are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm A (retreatment rituximab): Patients receive rituximab IV once a week for 4 weeks upon disease progression provided time to progression is more than 6 months. * Arm B (scheduled rituximab): Patients receive a single dose of rituximab IV once every 13 weeks until disease progression and in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed after induction rituximab treatment and at 26, 39, 65, 117, 169, and 221 weeks after randomization.
Patients are followed at least annually for 15 years from study entry.
Status Flow
Change History
14 versions recorded-
Jan 2026 — Present [monthly]
Completed PHASE3
-
Sep 2025 — Present [monthly]
Completed PHASE3
-
Sep 2024 — Sep 2025 [monthly]
Completed PHASE3
-
Jul 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]
Completed PHASE3
-
Mar 2024 — Jul 2024 [monthly]
Completed PHASE3
Status: Active Not Recruiting → Completed
▶ Show 9 earlier versions
-
Aug 2023 — Mar 2024 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Jul 2023 — Aug 2023 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Jul 2022 — Jul 2023 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Jan 2021 — Jul 2022 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Nov 2020 — Jan 2021 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Feb 2019 — Nov 2020 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Jun 2018 — Feb 2019 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Feb 2017 — Jun 2018 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
-
Jan 2017 — Feb 2017 [monthly]
Active Not Recruiting PHASE3
First recorded
Jan 2004
Trial started
Per CT.gov start date — pre-dates our first snapshot
Eligibility Summary
No eligibility information available.
Contact Information
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .