Testing the Effects of Novel Therapeutics for Newly Diagnosed, Untreated Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Cytarabine + Daunorubicin (7+3) vs (Daunorubicin and Cytarabine) Liposome, Cytarabine + Daunorubicin + Venetoclax, Azacitidine + Venetoclax, and (Daunorubicin and Cytarabine) Liposome + Venetoclax in Patients Aged 59 or Younger Who Are Considered High-Risk (Adverse) Acute Myeloid Leukemia As Determined by MYELOMATCH; A MYELOMATCH Clinical Trial
Sponsor: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Listed as NCT05554406, this observational or N/A phase trial focuses on Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm and remains actively recruiting participants. Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI), it has been updated 34 times since 2024, reflecting substantial change activity. This study contributes to the evolving evidence base for cancer treatment protocols.
Study Description(click to expand)PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission (CR) rates between each of the experimental regimens and cytarabine + daunorubicin (7+3). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the frequency and severity of toxicities with each of the regimens. II. To estimate complete remission (CR) rates, complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi, with and without MRD) rates, event-free survival (EFS), time to relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) with each of the regimens. III. To describe and compare MRD negative CR rates by genomic subgroups within and across randomized arms. BANKING OBJECTIVE: I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 5 arms. ARM I: Patients receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) continuously on days 1-7 and daunorubicin IV on days 1-3 per standard approach of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 1 cycle in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may receive an additional cycle of cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-5 and daunorubicin IV on days 1-2. Patients undergo echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan during screening. Patients also undergo a bone marrow aspiration and collection of blood throughout the trial. ARM II:...
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission (CR) rates between each of the experimental regimens and cytarabine + daunorubicin (7+3).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the frequency and severity of toxicities with each of the regimens.
II. To estimate complete remission (CR) rates, complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi, with and without MRD) rates, event-free survival (EFS), time to relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) with each of the regimens.
III. To describe and compare MRD negative CR rates by genomic subgroups within and across randomized arms.
BANKING OBJECTIVE:
I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 5 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) continuously on days 1-7 and daunorubicin IV on days 1-3 per standard approach of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 1 cycle in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may receive an additional cycle of cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-5 and daunorubicin IV on days 1-2. Patients undergo echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan during screening. Patients also undergo a bone marrow aspiration and collection of blood throughout the trial.
ARM II: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously on days 2-8 and daunorubicin IV on days 2-4 with venetoclax orally (PO) on days 1-11 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 1 cycle in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may receive an additional cycle of cytarabine IV continuously on days 2-6 and daunorubicin IV on days 2-3 with venetoclax PO on days 1-8. Patients undergo ECHO or MUGA scan during screening. Patients also undergo a bone marrow aspiration and collection of blood throughout the trial.
ARM III: Patients receive azacitidine subcutaneously (SC) or IV on days 1-7 and venetoclax PO on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo ECHO or MUGA scan during screening. Patients also undergo a bone marrow aspiration and collection of blood throughout the trial.
ARM IV: Patients receive daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3, and 5 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 1 cycle in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may receive an additional cycle of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Patients undergo ECHO or MUGA scan during screening. Patients also undergo a bone marrow aspiration and collection of blood throughout the trial.
ARM V: Patients receive daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3, and 5 and venetoclax PO on days 1-14 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 1 cycle in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may receive an additional cycle of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3 and venetoclax PO on days 1-7. Patients undergo ECHO or MUGA scan during screening. Patients also undergo a bone marrow aspiration and collection of blood throughout the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients follow up every month for the first year, every 2 months for the second year, every 3 months for the third year and every 6 months to year 5.
Status Flow
Change History
34 versions recorded-
May 4, 2026 — Present [daily]
Recruiting
-
Apr 28, 2026 — May 4, 2026 [daily]
Recruiting
-
Apr 18, 2026 — Apr 28, 2026 [daily]
Recruiting
-
Apr 16, 2026 — Apr 18, 2026 [daily]
Recruiting
Phase: PHASE2 → None
-
Mar 2026 — Apr 2026 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
▶ Show 29 earlier versions
-
Feb 2026 — Mar 2026 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Jan 2026 — Feb 2026 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Dec 2025 — Jan 2026 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Nov 2025 — Dec 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Oct 2025 — Nov 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Sep 2025 — Oct 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Aug 2025 — Sep 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Jul 2025 — Aug 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Jun 2025 — Jul 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
May 2025 — Jun 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Apr 2025 — May 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Mar 2025 — Apr 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Feb 2025 — Mar 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Jan 2025 — Feb 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Dec 2024 — Jan 2025 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Nov 2024 — Dec 2024 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Oct 2024 — Nov 2024 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Sep 2024 — Oct 2024 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Aug 2024 — Sep 2024 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
-
Jul 2024 — Aug 2024 [monthly]
Recruiting PHASE2
Status: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting
-
Jun 2024 — Jul 2024 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
-
Apr 2024 — Jun 2024 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
-
Mar 2024 — Apr 2024 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
-
Dec 2023 — Mar 2024 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
-
Nov 2023 — Dec 2023 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
-
Dec 2022 — Nov 2023 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
-
Nov 2022 — Dec 2022 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
-
Oct 2022 — Nov 2022 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
-
Sep 2022 — Oct 2022 [monthly]
Not Yet Recruiting PHASE2
First recorded
Eligibility Summary
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial tests whether the standard approach of cytarabine and daunorubicin in comparison to the following experimental regimens works to shrink cancer in patients with high risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML): 1) daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone; 2) cytarabine and daunorubicin with venetoclax; 3) azacitidine and venetoclax; 4) daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome and venetoclax. "High-risk" refers to traits that have been known to make the AML harder to treat. Cytarabine is in a class of medications called antimetabolites. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells in the body. Daunorubicin is in a class of medications called anthracyclines. It also works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells in the body. Azacitidine is in a class of medications called demethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. There is evidence that these newer experimental treatment regimens may work better in getting rid of more AML compared to the standard approach of cytarabine and daunorubicin.
Contact Information
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
For direct contact, visit the study record on ClinicalTrials.gov .